gravita' zero

Jul 17
Permalink

How much Force power can Yoda output?

physicsphysics:

Ignoring - of course - the prequels.

There’s a great SMBC comic exploring the geopolitical consequences of having Superman turn a crank to provide an unlimited source of energy. We could imagine Yoda using the Force to run a similar generator. But how much power could he really supply?

Yoda’s greatest display of raw power in the original trilogy came when he lifted Luke’s X-Wing from the swamp. As far as physically moving objects around goes, this was easily the biggest expenditure of energy through the Force we saw from anyone in the trilogy.

The energy it takes to lift an object to height h is equal to the object’s mass times the force of gravity times the height it’s lifted. The X-Wing scene lets us use this to put a lower limit on Yoda’s peak power output.

First we need to know how heavy the ship was. The X-Wing’s mass has never been canonically established, but its length has—16 meters. An F-22 is 19 meters long and weighs 19,700 lbs, so scaling down from this gives an estimate for the X-Wing of about 12,000 lbs (5 metric tons).

mx=mf22(1619)^35300kg

Next, we need to know how fast it was rising. I went over footage of the sc ene and timed the X-Wing’s rate of ascent as it was emerging from the water.

The front landing strut rises out of the water in about three and a half seconds, and I estimated the strut to be 1.4 meters long (based on a scene in A New Hope where a crew member squeezes past it), which tells us the X-Wing was rising at 0.39 m/s.

Lastly, we need to know the strength of gravity on Dagobah. Here, I figure I’m stuck, because while sci-fi fans are obsessive, it’s not like there’s gonna be a catalog of minor geophysical characteristics for every planet visited in Star Wars. Right?

Read More

[xkcd - what if?]

(Source: )

Comments (View) 271 notes
  1. anghraine reblogged this from physicsphysics
  2. vihu reblogged this from physicsphysics
  3. ultrasadism reblogged this from physicsphysics
  4. lilmikomiko reblogged this from pinkangelstar
  5. pinkangelstar reblogged this from physicsphysics
  6. celticheavens reblogged this from physicsphysics
  7. grangerstolethetardis reblogged this from exemplifyingennui
  8. varietyisgood reblogged this from gtps74
  9. gtps74 reblogged this from physicsphysics
  10. le-theatre-de-justin reblogged this from physicsphysics
  11. girlswithincendiaryvices reblogged this from physicsphysics
  12. chelseakanaley reblogged this from physicsphysics
  13. iheartnerds reblogged this from physicsphysics
  14. anothersunnyq reblogged this from physicsphysics
  15. sociallynonexistant reblogged this from squishysound
  16. wezzkhalifa reblogged this from physicsphysics
  17. thunderousapplause reblogged this from physicsphysics
  18. hyperspacefirefly reblogged this from physicsphysics
  19. amuzak940 reblogged this from physicsphysics
  20. thepoemthatdoesntrhyme reblogged this from physicsphysics
  21. robbie-robot reblogged this from physicsphysics
  22. morningstareveningmoon reblogged this from dnasplice
  23. dnasplice reblogged this from physicsphysics
  24. fascinatedbyanubarak reblogged this from physicsphysics
  25. karatekid245 reblogged this from physicsphysics
  26. beachead92 reblogged this from cadunnett
  27. hikarn reblogged this from sciencemicroblog
  28. smithyschillzone reblogged this from physicsphysics
  29. skullbandit89 reblogged this from physicsphysics
  30. wht-rabbit-obj reblogged this from mrniall
  31. mrniall reblogged this from physicsphysics
blog comments powered by Disqus